The Montana Weekly Work Comp Brief (#16 – Feb. 13, 2026)

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Montana Workers’ Compensation Court

No new enumerated decisions this period.

Montana Workers’ Compensation Stipulations Summary (through Feb. 13, 2026)
Plan  1
Case Name DOI Body Part(s) Settlement Type Settlement Amount Petitioner Attorney Respondent Attorney
Cynthia Katschke v. Montana Municipal Interlocal Authority Mutliple (6) Multiple Full and Final – Medicals Closed $76,000.00 Overturf, Greg

Odegaard Injury Lawyers

Weber, Morgan

Browning, Kaleczyc, Berry & Hoven, PC

Plan 2
Case Name DOI Body Part(s) Settlement Type Settlement Amount Petitioner Attorney Respondent Attorney
Zachary Arnold v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. 2/3/25 Head, neck, mid- and low-back Full and Final – Medical Closed $40,000.00 Matthew Braukmann,

Rimrock Law

Maynard, Joe

Crowley Fleck PLLP

Chris Avery v. National Specialty Ins. Co. 3/9/24 Right shoulder, ribs, and head Full and Final – Medicals Closed $50,000.00 Miller, Andrew

Miller Tourtlotte Law, PLLC

Smith, Charlie

Crowley Fleck PLLP

Claude Barnes v. Great West Casualty 3/2/23 Back, neck, right shoulder, right arm, right hand, and fingers Full and Final – Medicals Closed $90,000.00 Miller, Megan

Fair Claim Atttorneys

Maynard, Joe

Crowley Fleck PLLP

James Grundhauer v. Associated Loggers Exchange 10/22/20; 8/6/21; Bilateral shoulders, hands, cervical and lumbar spine Disputed Initial Compensability $5,000.00 Blackaby, Dean

Montana Work Comp Solutions

Harrington, Tom

Laird Cowley, PLLC

Andrew Iddles v. Victory Ins. Co. 5/15/25 Hip, bilateral hands, knee, lower leg, and back Full and Final – Medicals Closed $10,000.00 Storrar, Keif

Doubek, Pyfer & Storrar

Maynard, Joe

Crowley Fleck PLLP

Plan 3
Case Name DOI Body Part(s) Settlement Type Settlement Amount Petitioner Attorney Respondent Attorney
Terrance Schmidt v. Montana State Fund 6/19/24 Lungs / Body System Full and Final – Medicals Closed $50,000.00 Carey, Steve

Carey Law Firm PC

Meyer, Mark,

Montana State Fund

ESD Settlements Approved through Feb. 6, 2026
Plan 1
Claimant Name DOI Body Part Settlement Type Settlement Amount Attorney
Buchholz, Levi 4/5/25 Teeth Best Interest $5,000.00 None
Hutchings, Anthony 5/6/21 Ear(s) Best Interest $30,000.00 None
Plan 2
Claimant Name DOI Body Part Settlement Type Settlement Amount Attorney
Charbonneau, Robert 8/27/25 Soft Tissue Disputed Initial Compensability $45,000 Lighthall, David
Heiser, Andrew 5/31/25 Knee Disputed Initial Compensability $10,000.00 Dalpiaz, Leslae
Holum, Greg 7/13/21 Multiple Upper Extremities Petition for Settlement – Medicals Closed $100,000.00 Overturf, Lea
Lindemann, Natalie 4/12/24 Shoulder(s) Petition for Settlement – Medicals Closed $31,776.89 None
Sommerstedt, Daniel 12/30/24 Multiple Head Injury Best Interest $2,500.00 None
Plan 3
Claimant Name DOI Body Part Settlement Type Settlement Amount Attorney
Alick, Claude 12/13/25 Internal Organs Disputed Initial Compensability $1,000.00 None
Aragon, Chase 1/17/25 Facial Bones Disputed Initial Compensability $3,280.00 None
Belstad, Steven 10/10/24 Low Back Full and Final -Medicals Closed $29,000.00 Blackaby, Dean
Blevins, Alexandria 12/26/25 Ankle Other – Single Issue $8,000.00 None
Bushnell, Tressa 4/19/24 Low Back Best Interest $65,000.00 Tourtlotte, Matthew
Campbell, Darlene 6/16/25 Upper Back Disputed Initial Compensability $3,000.00 None
Claridge, Stryder 3/7/24 Upper Back Disputed Initial Compensability $35,000.00 None
Cooper, James 9/3/25 Knee Disputed Initial Compensability $15,000.00 Overturf, Lea
Davis, Michael 7/8/23 Skull Petition for Settlement – Medicals Closed $405,078.74 Murphy, Matthew
Dyer, Jorri 10/23/25 Internal Organs Disputed Initial Compensability $4,000.00 None
Edstrom, Tanya 7/9/25 Skull Best Interest $700.00 None
Fischer, Wyatt 8/25/23 Low Back Petition for Settlement – Medicals Closed $42,000.00 Dalpiaz, Leslae
Jackson, Nathan 9/17/25 Low Back Disputed Initial Compensability $6,550.00 None
May, Ethan 10/3/25 Finger(s) Disputed Initial Compensability $3,000.00 Storrar, Keif
Monroe, Hughie 4/11/23 Soft Tissue Best Interest $5,000.00 None
Parker, Ronald 5/6/24 Knee Best Interest $70,000.00 Duckworth, Kiel
Postma, Bradley 10/4/23 Multiple Lower Extremities Petition for Settlement – Medicals Reserved $45,000.00 Blackaby, Dean
Shearer, Daniel 8/1/25 Low Back Disputed Initial Compensability $4,550.00 None
5 Key Insights for Montana Work Comp Professionals
  1. No New Enumerated WCC Decisions – Litigation Risk Currently Settlement-Driven

The report reflects no new enumerated decisions from the Montana Workers’ Compensation Court during this period.

Practical implication: Risk exposure is currently being shaped more by negotiated settlements than by new appellate-level legal interpretations. Practitioners should:

  • Monitor stipulation trends as proxies for valuation benchmarks.
  • Expect carriers to rely on historical precedent rather than new doctrinal shifts.
  • Recognize this as a relatively stable legal climate (no new adverse precedent).
  1. Plan 3 Shows the Highest Severity and Variability in Settlement Values

Plan 3 settlements demonstrate the widest range and highest outlier values:

  • $405,078.74 (Skull – Petition for Settlement)
  • $70,000 (Knee – Best Interest)
  • $65,000 (Low Back – Best Interest)
  • Multiple disputed compensability resolutions under $10,000

Key takeaway: Plan 3 claims (Montana State Fund/self-insured public sector) continue to show:

  • Significant exposure in head/skull and multi-system cases.
  • Large valuation swings depending on settlement type (Best Interest vs. Petition vs. Disputed Compensability).

For valuation modeling, skull/head cases under Plan 3 are materially higher risk than standard orthopedic soft tissue disputes.

  1. Disputed Initial Compensability Claims Frequently Resolve at Predictable Low Bands

Across Plans 2 and 3, disputed initial compensability settlements commonly cluster between:

  • $1,000 – $10,000 (Plan 3)
  • $10,000 – $45,000 (Plan 2)

This pattern suggests:

  • Carriers are pricing litigation risk conservatively when medical causation or coverage is weak.
  • Petitioners are often accepting early compromise rather than funding full medical causation litigation.

For practitioners, this creates a benchmarking tool:

  • Minor body parts or questionable mechanism → expect low five-figure ceiling.
  • Multi-body or better liability facts → mid-five figures possible.
  1. “Medicals Closed” Remains the Dominant Resolution Structure

The majority of higher-value settlements—across all three Plans—are structured as:

  • Full and Final – Medicals Closed
  • Petition for Settlement – Medicals Closed

This confirms that:

  • Carriers are aggressively seeking closure of future medical exposure.
  • Petitioners are monetizing medical risk rather than leaving treatment open.
  • Lifetime medical liability remains a significant valuation driver.

Strategically, this reinforces the importance of:

  • Future medical cost modeling.
  • Accurate impairment and surgical probability forecasting.
  • Use of structured projections when negotiating six-figure exposures.
  1. Defense Counsel Concentration Suggests Strategic Litigation Alignment

There is noticeable repeat defense representation, particularly:

  • Crowley Fleck PLLP (multiple Plan 2 matters)
  • Laird Cowley
  • Montana State Fund internal counsel

This suggests:

  • Certain carriers are consolidating work with experienced defense firms.
  • Litigation style and valuation patterns may be firm-specific.
  • Plaintiff-side professionals should anticipate consistent defense approaches in Plan 2 cases involving Hartford, National Specialty, and Great West.

Work Comp Articles

  • The Montana Weekly…

    Montana Workers’ Compensation Court No new enumerated decisions this period.…

  • The Montana Weekly…

    Montana Workers’ Compensation Court Derek Trogden v. Montana State Fund…

  • The Montana Weekly…

    Montana Workers’ Compensation Court No new enumerated decisions this period.…

  • Free Case Review

    We’ll review your case for free. You won’t be limited by the clock. We will talk as long as necessary to understand your claim. We will give you a clear roadmap and help you understand the steps you can take to improve your position.