The Montana Weekly Work Comp Brief – #29 May 15, 2026

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Montana Workers’ Compensation Court
PUBLISHED OPINIONS

(No decisions reported during this period)

SUBMITTED MATTERS
Motions & Miscellaneous Matters
Case Pleading Date Submitted
Rutledge v. Technology Ins. Co. Petitioner’s Cross-Motion for Summary Judgement 2/11/26
Rutledge v. Technology Ins. Co. Respondent’s Motion for Summary Judgment 2/17/26
Glover v. Montana State Fund Petitioner’s Motion to Stay IME and Motion for Discovery Sanctions 4/3/26
Munn v. Montana State Fund Petitioner’s Motion for Summary Judgment 4/13/26
DesRosier v. MMIA

 

Respondent’s Motion for Summary Judgment 5/4/26
Crisler v. Zurich Am. Ins. Co.

 

Respondent’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment 5/11/26
Crisler v. Zurich Am. Ins. Co.

 

Respondent’s Motion in Limine 5/11/26
Glover v. Montana State Fund

 

Petitioner’s Motion in Limine 5/11/26
Parker / Leggitt v. Safeway

 

Respondent’s Motion for Summary Judgment 5/12/26
Krueger v. Clear Spring Property & Cas. Co.

 

Respondent’s Request to Hold Trial in Butte 5/13/26
Montana Workers’ Compensation Stipulations Summary (through May 14, 2026)
PLAN 1
Case Name DOI Body Part(s) Settlement Type Settlement Amount Petitioner Attorney Respondent Attorney
Ladonna Harkins v. MACO Work Comp Trust 1/1/06 Bilateral upper extremities Full and Final – Medicals Closed $50,000.00 Simon, Paul

Stephens Brooke, PC

Blackaby, Dean

Montana Work Comp Solutions

Deleaha Thompson v. The Kroger Co. 6/15/25 Left shoulder Full and Finals – Medicals Closed $55,000.00 Braukmann, Matt

Rimrock Law, PLLC

Smith, Charlie

Crowley Fleck PLLP

Darren Wilson v. Federal Express Corp. 11/3/25 Right groin Disputed Initial Compensability $4,000.00 Overturf, Lea

Odegaard Law Group PC

Maynard, Joe

Crowley Fleck PLLP

PLAN 2
Case Name DOI Body Part(s) Settlement Type Settlement Amount Petitioner Attorney Respondent Attorney
Carla Breeland v. Security National Ins. Co. 10/16/24 Bilateral wrists Full and Final – Medicals Closed $75,000.00 Brann, Aaron Maynard, Joe

Crowley Fleck PLLP

Christopher Cooper v. Hartford Underwriters Ins. Co. 2/1/24; 2/16/24; Facial injury; upper arm/shoulder Full and Final – Medicals Closed $75,000.00 Plath, Russ

Plath Kemmick Law

Maynard, Joe

Crowley Fleck PLLP

Jhomar Monrroy Diaz v. Hanover Ins. Co. 8/18/25 Unidentified Full and Final – Medicals Closed $25,000.00 Murphy, Matthew

Murphy Law Firm

Bell, Tom

Laird Cowley, PLLC

Bledar Doda v. Travelers Casualty Ins. Co. 5/21/25 Shoulder, neck, head, upper back, lower back, left thigh, left knee, and pelvis Full and Final – Medicals Closed $7,500.00 Evans, Alex

Glacier Law Firm

Maynard, Joe

Crowley Fleck PLLP

Richard Malach-Fuller v. Safety National Casualty Co. 3/24/25; 8/20/25 Chest, left foot Full and Finals – Medicals Closed $3,500.00 None Smith, Charlie

Crowley Fleck PLLP

PLAN 3
Case Name DOI Body Part(s) Settlement Type Settlement Amount Petitioner Attorney Respondent Attorney
Olaf Medrud 12/5/23 Low back Full and Final – Medicals Closed $180,000.00 Blackaby, Dean

Montana Work Comp Solutions

Wang, Haocheng

Montana State Fund

ESD Settlements Approved through May 8, 2026
PLAN 1
Claimant Name DOI Body Part Settlement Type Settlement Amount Attorney Name
Conte, Paul 9/20/24 Low back Best Interests $11,000.00 None
Geisler, Ryan 12/13/24 Lungs Disputed Initial Compensability $7,500.00 Rasmusson, Eric
PLAN 2
Claimant Name DOI Body Part Settlement Type Settlement Amount Attorney Name
Hattlestad, Mike 4/14/23 Elbow Best Interests $3,500.00 None
Laforge, Michael 10/6/25 Lower arm Best Interests $12,500.00 Dalpiaz, Leslae
Porter, Rebecca 4/17/25 Abdomen/ Groin Disputed Initial Compensability $9,500.00 Kemmick, Haley
Wynne, Phil 7/3/20 Low back Best Interests $129,311.43 None
PLAN 3
Claimant Name DOI Body Part Settlement Type Settlement Amount Attorney Name
Banderas, Joseph 1/27/26 Thumb Best Interests $650.00 None
Hill, Cassadie 8/10/22 Knee Best Interests $20,000.00 Bran, Aaron
Nelson, John 2/17/26 Skull Single Issue $4,000.00 None
Robinson, Lewis 8/17/24 Chest Petition for Settlement – Medicals Closed $36,000.00 None
Saffer, Darcy 3/19/24 Ankle Best Interests $6,500.00 None
Sebens, Debbie 11/6/20 Low back Best Interests $3,116.00 None
           
Key Insights for Montana Work Comp Professionals
  1. Court activity snapshot

The Montana Workers’ Compensation Court had no published opinions during the covered period, but there is a notable queue of dispositive motions and miscellaneous matters awaiting decision, including multiple cross-motions for summary judgment, motions to stay an IME, motions in limine, and a venue request to hold trial in Butte. This signals active litigation on compensability and evidentiary issues despite the absence of new precedent, which may affect case valuation and strategy while outcomes are pending.

  1. Emerging motion themes

Several matters involve cross-motions for summary judgment (e.g., Rutledge v. Technology Insurance Co., Munn v. Montana State Fund, DesRosier v. MMIA, Parker/Leggitt v. Safeway), which suggests parties are pressing threshold legal issues rather than reserving everything for trial. The presence of motions to stay IMEs and for discovery sanctions (e.g., Glover v. Montana State Fund) and motions in limine in both Glover and Crisler indicates heightened scrutiny of medical examinations and evidentiary boundaries.

  1. Stipulation trends under Plan 1 and Plan 2

Across Plan 1 and Plan 2, the predominant structure is “Full and Final — Medicals Closed,” including bilateral upper extremity, shoulder, multi-level spine, and multi-body-part injuries, often for five-figure lump sums. There is also use of “Disputed Initial Compensability” settlements at relatively modest amounts (e.g., Darren Wilson v. Federal Express Corp. at $4,000; similar patterns in ESD data), reflecting a continued practice of resolving threshold liability disputes via compromise rather than adjudication.

  1. High- and low-value outliers and body-part mix

The data shows a wide settlement range: from low-dollar global resolutions (e.g., $3,500 to $7,500 with medicals closed on multi-body-part cases) to a six-figure Plan 3 stipulation (Olaf Medrud, low back, $180,000, medicals closed). Low back injuries recur as a high-value driver in both stipulation and ESD settlements, while smaller “best interests” and disputed compensability settlements tend to involve single joints or more limited anatomical regions such as elbow, thumb, ankle, or localized groin/abdomen injuries.

  1. ESD settlement practice and attorney involvement

The ESD-approved settlements through early May 2026 show frequent use of “Best Interests” resolutions and “Disputed Initial Compensability” settlements across all three plans, often with no attorney representing the claimant in lower-dollar cases. In contrast, higher-value ESD settlements (e.g., a $129,311.43 low back settlement under Plan 2) more commonly feature claimant counsel involvement, highlighting a potential correlation between representation and settlement magnitude

Work Comp Articles

  • The Montana Weekly…

    Montana Workers’ Compensation Court PUBLISHED OPINIONS (No decisions reported during…

  • The Montana Weekly…

    MONTANA WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COURT Published Opinions (No decisions reported during…

  • The Montana Weekly…

    Montana Workers’ Compensation Court (No decisions reported during this period)…

  • Free Case Review

    We’ll review your case for free. You won’t be limited by the clock. We will talk as long as necessary to understand your claim. We will give you a clear roadmap and help you understand the steps you can take to improve your position.