The Montana Weekly Work Comp Brief (#33 June 12, 2026)

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
MONTANA WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COURT

No decisions this reporting period.

Submitted Matters
Motions & Miscellaneous Matters
Case Pleading Date Submitted
Rutledge v. Technology Ins. Co. Petitioner’s Cross-Motion for Summary Judgement 2/11/26
Rutledge v. Technology Ins. Co. Respondent’s Motion for Summary Judgment 2/17/26
Crisler v. Zurich Am. Ins. Co.

 

Respondent’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment 5/11/26
Crisler v. Zurich Am. Ins. Co.

 

Respondent’s Motion in Limine 5/11/26
Parker / Leggitt v. Safeway

 

Respondent’s Motion for Summary Judgment 5/12/26
Guitron v. UEF UEF’s Motion for Summary Judgment 5/15/26

 

Guitron v. UEF Villegas Del Villar’s Motion for Summary Judgment 5/20/26

 

Crisler v. Zurich Am. Ins. Co.

 

Petitioner’s Counter-Motion for Summary Judgment 5/21/26
Upcoming Trials, Hearings & Conferences

No matters currently scheduled.

Montana Workers’ Compensation Stipulations Summary (through June 5, 2026)
PLAN 2
Case Name DOI Body Part(s) Settlement Type Settlement Amount Petitioner Attorney Respondent Attorney
Rodney Butler v. Fire Ins. Exchange 8/1/25 Low back; left shoulder; left wrist Full and Final – Medicals Closed $14,149.65 None Smith, Charlie

Crowley Fleck PLLP

Steven Jackson v. Security Nat’l Ins. Co. 4/5/24 Low back Full and Final – Medicals Closed $50,000.00 including MSA ($6,177.24) Tempel-St. John, Stacy

Fair Claim Law

Maynard, Joe

Crowley Fleck PLLP

 PLAN 3
Case Name DOI Body Part(s) Settlement Type Settlement Amount Petitioner Attorney Respondent Attorney
Tyson Lepinski v. Montana State Fund 12/7/23 Head; neck; gastrointestinal Full and Final – Medicals Closed $60,000.00 Murphy, Matt

Murphy Law Firm

Coate, Erik

Montana State Fund

ESD Settlements Approved through June 5, 2026
PLAN 1
Claimant Name DOI Body Part Settlement Type Settlement Amount Attorney Name
Gudmundson, Clayton 4/18/24 Knee Petition for Settlement-Medicals Closed $45,000.00 Plath, Russ
Harris, Tamara 12/5/22 Knee Petition for Settlement – Medicals Closed $5,000.00 None
Miller, Johnathan 1/21/25 Body systems Best Interests $35,000.00 Tourtlotte, Matthew
PLAN 2
Claimant Name DOI Body Part Settlement Type Settlement Amount Attorney Name
Hambright, Kathleen 8/12/25 Knee Best Interests $35,000.00 Rasmusson, Eric
Sweeney, Kerry 3/1/24 Hand Best Interests $10,000.00 Helmer, Chris
Urquidi, James 5/9/25 Low back Best Interests $14,000.00 None
PLAN 3
Claimant Name DOI Body Part Settlement Type Settlement Amount Attorney Name
Borchard, Katherine 3/31/26 Low back Disputed Initial Compensability $1,800.00 None
Chaffin, Erica 5/30/24 Wrist Best Interests $26,000.00 Dalpiaz, Leslae
Cook, William 1/13/26 Finger(s) Best Interests $2,375.00 None
Hanson, Heidi 9/19/01 Soft tissue Best Interests $70,000.00 None
Hanson, Donald 9/18/87 Chest Petition for Settlement – Medicals Reserved $10,000.00 Blackaby, Dean
Peterson, Roger 1/23/25 Internal organs Best Interests $45,000.00 None
Robinson, Jarrod 10/27/25 Upper arm Best Interests $7,000.00 None
Wise, Tamera 8/5/24 Pelvis Best Interests $2,403.70 None
UEF
Claimant Name DOI Body Part Settlement Type Settlement Amount Attorney Name
St. Clair, Thomas 8/20/24 Low back Petition for Settlement – Medicals Closed $80,000.00 Stover, Shelby
 Key Insights for Montana Work Comp Professionals
  1. Litigation Activity Is Concentrated in Dispositive Motions

Although no trials, hearings, or conferences are currently scheduled, there are multiple pending summary judgment motions and related dispositive motions. The cases of Rutledge, Crisler, and Guitron account for most of the Court’s active docket, suggesting that compensability and legal issues are increasingly being resolved through motion practice rather than trial.

  1. Settlement Values Continue to Vary Widely Based on Exposure

Recent settlements range from as little as $1,800 (disputed initial compensability low-back claim) to $80,000 (UEF low-back claim with medicals closed). This reinforces that settlement value is driven less by body part alone and more by factors such as accepted liability, future medical exposure, wage-loss risk, and litigation posture.

  1. “Best Interests” Settlements Remain the Dominant ESD Resolution Mechanism

Most ESD-approved settlements during this reporting period were approved as “Best Interests” settlements rather than traditional petitions for settlement. This trend suggests continued reliance on the Department approval process, particularly for smaller claims and claims involving unrepresented workers.

  1. Low-Back Claims Continue to Generate Significant Settlement Activity

Low-back injuries appear repeatedly throughout both the WCC stipulations and ESD approvals, including settlements of $50,000, $60,000, $80,000, and other amounts. The frequency of lumbar-spine claims in the settlement data underscores their continued role as one of the most costly and litigated injury categories in Montana workers’ compensation.

  1. Older Claims Still Produce Meaningful Settlement Exposure

Several settlements involve injuries dating back decades, including claims from 1987 and 2001. The presence of these older claims demonstrates the long-tail liability associated with Montana workers’ compensation, particularly where medical benefits remain open or claimants continue to require treatment many years after the original injury.

Work Comp Articles

  • The Montana Weekly…

    MONTANA WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COURT No decisions this reporting period. Submitted…

  • The Montana Weekly…

    Montana Workers’ Compensation Court Case Citation: DesRosier v. Montana Municipal…

  • The Montana Weekly…

    Montana Workers’ Compensation Court    NO PUBLISHED OPINIONS THIS REPORTING…

  • Free Case Review

    We’ll review your case for free. You won’t be limited by the clock. We will talk as long as necessary to understand your claim. We will give you a clear roadmap and help you understand the steps you can take to improve your position.