The Weekly Montana Work Comp Brief (#10 January 2, 2026)

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Montana Workers’ Compensation Court

No new enumerated decisions this period.

Montana Workers’ Compensation Stipulations Summary (through Jan. 1, 2026
PLAN 1

No approved stipulations for Plan 1 carriers for this period.

PLAN 2

No approved stipulations for Plan 2 carriers for this period.

PLAN 3

No approved stipulations for Plan 3 (Montana State Fund) for this period.

ESD Settlements Approved through 12/22/2025
Plan 1
Claimant Name DOI Body Part Settlement Type Settlement Amount Attorney Name
Quinn, Daniel 3/23/2022 Lower Back Area Petition for Settlement – Medical Closed $50,000.00 Huppert, Andrew
Plan 2
Claimant Name DOI Body Part Settlement Type Settlement Amount Attorney Name
Schriver, Larry 10/3/2022 Elbow Petition for Settlement – Medical Closed $101,556.00  
Unger, David 12/9/2024 Multiple Body Parts Petition for Best Interest $35,000.00  
Plan 3
Claimant Name DOI Body Part Settlement Type Settlement Amount Attorney Name
Blair, Robert 3/12/2024 Skull Petition for Best Interest $70,000.00  
Bullcalf, Wade 2/22/2024 Finger(s) Petition for Best Interest $30,000.00  
Burckhard, Dustin 5/25/2024 Foot Petition for Best Interest $75,000.00  
Salminen, William 6/27/1986 Lower Back Area Petition for Best Interest $75,000.00 Salminen, Vincent
Syrjaca, Timothy 9/11/2024 Soft Tissue Petition for Settlement – Medical Reserved $78,000.00 Helmer, Chris
5 Key Insights for Montana Work Comp Professionals
  1. No Court-Approved Stipulations Across All Plans

For the reporting period through January 1, 2026, no stipulations were approved by the Montana Workers’ Compensation Court for Plan 1, Plan 2, or Plan 3 carriers. This is likely attributable to the holidays.

  1. All Settlement Activity Occurred Through the ESD Process

Despite the absence of court stipulations, ESD settlements were actively approved across all three plans, reinforcing the ESD process as the primary settlement mechanism during this period. This highlights the continued importance of administrative settlement pathways over formal court resolution.

  1. Plan 3 (State Fund) Accounts for the Majority of Settlements

Plan 3 claims represent four of the seven total ESD settlements, covering a wide range of injury types (skull, fingers, foot, soft tissue, and lumbar spine). This concentration suggests:

  • Higher settlement throughput within the State Fund, and/or
  • Greater reliance on Best Interest settlements for Plan 3 claim resolution.
  1. Best Interest Settlements  Appear to Dominate Over Medical Closure (but not really)

Most settlements—particularly in Plans 2 and 3—were approved as Petitions for Best Interest, rather than full medical closures. This likely just a feature of the reporting data or interchangeable nature of the terms.

  1. Settlement Values Vary Widely, Reflecting Injury Complexity

Approved settlement amounts range from $30,000 to $101,556, with higher values associated with:

  • Multiple body parts
  • Head or spinal injuries
  • Reserved or ongoing medical considerations

This underscores that injury complexity and future care risk continue to be the primary drivers of settlement valuation, rather than plan type alone.

Work Comp Articles

  • The Weekly Montana…

    Montana Workers’ Compensation Court No new enumerated decisions this period.…

  • The Weekly Montana…

    Montana Workers’ Compensation Court No new enumerated decisions this period.…

  • The Montana Weekly…

    Montana Workers’ Compensation Court No new enumerated decisions this period.…

  • Free Case Review

    We’ll review your case for free. You won’t be limited by the clock. We will talk as long as necessary to understand your claim. We will give you a clear roadmap and help you understand the steps you can take to improve your position.